On a Different Note: A One-State Solution for Israel and Palastine

Articulate Advocate: Ali Abunimah may be the most-recognized face of the Boycott Israel movement. He draws crowds on college campuses with his call for a ‘one-state solution,’ meaning Palestinians would enjoy equal rights and the vote within a single state encompassing Israel and the occupied territories.
Ali Abunimah

Is a one-state solution possible in Israel?

Ali Abunimah is the leading American proponent of a one-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which calls for a shared democratic state of Israel.  Abunimah’s popular Chicago-based website, The Electronic Intifada, is a not-for-profit, independent online publication which covers the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from a Palestinian perspective.

The “one-state solution” refers to the creation of a unitary, federal or confederate Israeli-Palestinian state, which would include all of the present territory of Israel, the West Bank, and include East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip.  The idea would be to have a state in which all residents of Israel and its occupied territories enjoy equal rights and obligations.

Abuminah states: “The historic land of Palestine belongs to all who live in it and to those who were expelled or exiled from it since 1948, regardless of religion, ethnicity, national origin or current citizenship status.”

Most of the arguments against the idea seem to focus on the fact that the “Jewishness” of Israel would be taken out in favor of majority Arab rule.

“In other words, the elimination of the self-determination of the one state that Jews have anywhere in the world,”  states Stephen Kuperberg, executive director of the Israel on Campus coalition.

Abunimah’s belief in a one-state solution is rare, but not unheard of.

Peter Hain, British Minister for the Middle East from 1999-2001 also argues for the one-state solution and has had doubts about a two-state solution.

“But I am increasingly unsure about whether (the two-state solution) is still achievable – mainly because, as time has marched on, and successive negotiating initiatives have come and gone, the land earmarked for a viable Palestinian state has been remorselessly occupied by Israeli settlers,” stated Hain.

Hain claims that U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and British First Secretary of State William Hague have also speculated that “the window for a two-state solution” is closing.

According to the New Statesman, a one-state solution has long been the favored option of many secular Israelis and Palestinians for reasons of principle.  Soon it may be not only the most principled, but also the most realistic.

http://forward.com/articles/152716/lightning-rod-of-the-boycott-israel-movement/?p=all

http://electronicintifada.net/

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2014/01/peter-hain-one-state-solution-israeli-palestinian-conflict-must-be-considered

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/16643728-israel-must-accept-one-state-solution

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s